With all the furore over the changes to device targeting in Enhanced Campaigns, it's easy to overlook the improvements in targeting that have happened elsewhere within your AdWords Account. One of the most fun to explore is the ability to alter bids by specific location targets and it's something that's particularly useful when you target the US.
Let's say you sell those good old Widgets and you only ship to the US. Naturally your AdWords Campaigns are targeting the US but because you're a good manager you understand that performance varies from state to state so you want to control what you spend by state. Before Enhanced Campaigns were introduced you would have had to have had a Campaign for every state - or at least for every set of states that were different - and one for the US in total, excluding all the states to which you've applied specific budgets. It could be quite messy. Enhanced Campaigns make it a lot easier to control spending on CPC from state to state, all within one Campaign.
If you've got enough conversion data in your AdWords Account you might like to use that alone for deciding how to split your spend but I prefer to use Analytics bringing in all traffic sources, not just AdWords, partly because you're dealing with a larger data set so theoretically more accurate modelling, but also because the pretty map is much easier to work out. Here's a location map from an Account showing Transactions.
The palest green here is 0 Transactions so that's the colour of New Mexico bottom middle, to the left of the big dark green Texas. There are some pretty obvious trends here. California, Texas and New York State are running away with the business while Florida and Pennsylvania are not far behind. But there's a lot of states here with no transactions at all (New Mexico, Idaho, North Dakota, etc.).
Let's say I'm only really bothered about the biggest sellers and the worst and I'll leave all those in the middle to fight it out amongst themselves. So I make a list, I'm going to make CA, TX & NY + 10%, FL & PA + 5%, NM, ID & ND - 10%. Now I log into my AdWords Account, select my Campaign and choose "Settings", then Locations from the button above the graph (at the moment all I can see is "United States"), then "Edit Locations", beneath the graph. In the page that appears I add all 8 States (making sure I choose the State entries) - nothing more to do in this page, then Save these new locations. My list will now show "United States" and the new 8 specific states I've chosen.
Alongside each entry is a column for "Bid adj." and I'll click into each position (at the moment just showing a hyphen) for each of the new states. When you click in the column a dialogue box will appear and you'll be able to choose whether to "Increase by" or "Decrease by" a percentage, the Max. CPC for that particular state. I go through my list increasing California and Texas by 10%, decreasing New Mexico by 10% and so on until they're all done.
That's it! From this point on, bid values from these specific states will be adjusted according to the percentages entered so I can pay less for my clicks from poorly converting states (while still showing Ads, just in case) and make sure my Ads are #1 for states that convert well.
You can analyse this stuff until the cows come home but here's a few things to remember:
1) Make sure you use a decent time period and number of data points to make these important decisions. Don't change your entire account spending pattern on the basis of 3 sales in a 24 hour period. I'd suggest you use data from at least a month, better yet a quarter, better still a whole year to allow for seasonal variations.
2) Get down in the detail. While in my example above I've boosted all of New York state, a closer look at the data might show that almost all of the transactions were actually from the City. It might make more sense to + 5% the state and another + 5% the City itself.
3) Watch those numbers. You can make bid adjustments all over the place in Enhanced Campaigns and they're all cumulative. If you boost for time, location and device you could end up with some quite high CPC figures from very modest beginnings - just be aware.
Of course, you may still want to split your Campaigns up to split the actual budget, but this new Location bid adjustment gives you another level of granularity to control exactly where your money is spent, and that has to be a good thing.
Monday, 1 April 2013
Location, Location, Location Bid Adjustments
Friday, 15 March 2013
You Must Choose Wisely...
I'm never sure whether to be amazed or saddened, or a little of both, when I come across a case like this. Just now on the AdWords Community there's a poster who's asking for help because their "agency" have denied them access to their AdWords Account. The poster spends a very large sum of money with this agency every year yet they can't even see their own advertising account or have any evidence of what work is being done.
I'm amazed because to me this sounds insane, I mean, who would make a decision like this in the first place and who would allow it to continue? If I said to you, dear reader, "Pay me £5,000 every month to manage your AdWords Account, on the understanding that I'll never let you see what I've done, and you'll never have access to the actual AdWords Account running your Ads." you'd laugh, wouldn't you?
I'm saddened because the tale is not an uncommon one. This poster is not unusual and in fairness they've not been naïve, they've just fallen foul of the same issue we all face when we need an "expert" to do work for us; we're at the mercy of their goodwill and honesty. It's very easy for me to say the way this agency works is unjust and they should be ashamed of themselves and that the hiring company have made a bad mistake, but it's easy because in this case I'm the expert. If I take my car in for a service and Ray says it needs a new clutch and it's going to cost £X, I have no idea whether what he's saying is true. I have to trust him. If, sometime down the line I have some way of proving that it didn't need a new clutch I'll realise I was fooled but I shouldn't feel bad because I had no way of knowing at the time.
(Luckily Ray is a very nice man who I trust totally. My car does need a service soon so I'd better be nice.).
There is something you can do in the case of AdWords though, something very easy. Ask. I'd rather answer 10,000 questions in a day from people who hadn't yet taken on an agency like this than answer just one from someone who I suspect may have been paying a lot of money without much reward.
You don't have to trust me either. Any decent AdWords consultant will tell you that in almost all cases the client should own the Account and the agency should be provided with access to it, not the other way around. In this way the client always retains complete control and always has full and total visibility of what it being done.
There are some very rare cases where I'd consider running Ads on behalf of a client but they'd all be very very small budgeted, short-term tests, not an ongoing promotion with any real budget.
So, if you're thinking of hiring an agency and you're not sure what to ask or what they should be offering, ask for help in the Community, we'll give it gladly.
I'm amazed because to me this sounds insane, I mean, who would make a decision like this in the first place and who would allow it to continue? If I said to you, dear reader, "Pay me £5,000 every month to manage your AdWords Account, on the understanding that I'll never let you see what I've done, and you'll never have access to the actual AdWords Account running your Ads." you'd laugh, wouldn't you?
I'm saddened because the tale is not an uncommon one. This poster is not unusual and in fairness they've not been naïve, they've just fallen foul of the same issue we all face when we need an "expert" to do work for us; we're at the mercy of their goodwill and honesty. It's very easy for me to say the way this agency works is unjust and they should be ashamed of themselves and that the hiring company have made a bad mistake, but it's easy because in this case I'm the expert. If I take my car in for a service and Ray says it needs a new clutch and it's going to cost £X, I have no idea whether what he's saying is true. I have to trust him. If, sometime down the line I have some way of proving that it didn't need a new clutch I'll realise I was fooled but I shouldn't feel bad because I had no way of knowing at the time.
(Luckily Ray is a very nice man who I trust totally. My car does need a service soon so I'd better be nice.).
There is something you can do in the case of AdWords though, something very easy. Ask. I'd rather answer 10,000 questions in a day from people who hadn't yet taken on an agency like this than answer just one from someone who I suspect may have been paying a lot of money without much reward.
You don't have to trust me either. Any decent AdWords consultant will tell you that in almost all cases the client should own the Account and the agency should be provided with access to it, not the other way around. In this way the client always retains complete control and always has full and total visibility of what it being done.
There are some very rare cases where I'd consider running Ads on behalf of a client but they'd all be very very small budgeted, short-term tests, not an ongoing promotion with any real budget.
So, if you're thinking of hiring an agency and you're not sure what to ask or what they should be offering, ask for help in the Community, we'll give it gladly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
